On the firing of Paul Horsley, The KC Star classical music and dance critic

June 26, 2008 · 3 Comments

Ward Holmquist photo

It feels a little odd for me to be writing in support of a critic; after all, performers and critics aren’t supposed to care for each other, much less associate. As artistic director of the Lyric Opera of Kansas City, Paul reviewed my work at least four times a year, and I read, along with everyone else, what he thought of our artistic efforts. In my business, we all disagree on whether reviews significantly influence ticket sales, but we all use every good word ever written about us to promote our organizations, our projects and our individual careers. We crave the imprimatur of the critic almost as much as the applause of the audience.

Paul is a gifted musician with a probing intellect and a deep love for the art forms he covers. I greatly admire the writing style he has developed, which allows him to digest performances and submit cogent reviews before we performers have finished our post-performance festivities or our evening’s patrons have gone to bed. His other, in depth articles, reveal his deep, ever-widening insight into the purpose of art and artists in our society, and his thoughtful approach to educating his readers. I was not always pleased to see in print what he thought of one of our productions, but I rarely had fundamental disagreements with his assessments.

A somewhat anomalous vein (for a critic) I see running through his work and in our on- and off-record conversations is his humanity. Perhaps copious scathing, snide personal attacks would have made his writing more controversially appealing to some; Paul seems to suffer the curse of being a man who actually respects and likes other human beings, and is liked and respected in return.

Those who attend and support the rich, broad arts scene in Kansas City will have to look to sources other than the Star for credible coverage of this important area of their lives, and another local paper will eventually go under for neglecting what should be its primary mission – covering its own town in a professional manner.

This is an epitaph for only the Kansas City Star portion of Paul’s fine career in the arts. I am certain that he, and the other worthy arts writers, will find homes as new, economically viable reportage and commentary vehicles come into being.

Categories: Ward's commentary
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

3 responses so far ↓

  • Richard G. Dawson // June 28, 2008 at 10:21 pm | Reply

    We are looking forward to the opening of the Performing Arts Center, which will provide a vastly improved site for classical music, opera, and dance. And to welcome this blossoming , the Star eliminates its music/dance critic position! In the past year, I have attended at least two excellent performances because of the review by Paul Horsley. How are people to tell what they would be sorry they missed? In many cases it is because of a review by a critic we trust. The various arts need dedicated reporters who understand them and can pass on an educated and sensitive picture of the what is offered. I have subscribed to Our Paper for decades; your reviews been a strong asset. Please reconsider this snub to those of us who support high-quality music in this community. As I recall, more people attend cultural events than Chiefs and Royals games!

    Richard G. Dawson
    5804 Charlotte
    Kansas City MO 64110-3018
    816-361-9141

  • Keith Harmon // June 29, 2008 at 9:01 pm | Reply

    A city’s musical performance history is traced by these very individual (usually one time only) cultural events.. If no record or criticism of them is maintained it is much as if they had never happened. Local artists of merit are neither heard nor discussed by the media which means they are not given anything to put in their scrapbooks or stimulate their professional growth. If the coverage is not by someone with musical credentials it cannot be taken as anything but an insult. Criticism is an area where the instant media cannot compete effectively with newspapers. We need the movie and book reviewers too but every new film and book is reviewed over and over again and available to all by a quick GOOGLE. Our local performing arts history will vanish if our newspaper doesn’t do the job.
    Keith O. Harmon

  • Robert McNichols, Jr. // July 1, 2008 at 3:50 pm | Reply

    Time and time again I have scene the dramatic way in which having such a viable resource could help shape the audience in positive ways for performances. This position is a very skilled position, and can’t just be done by someone not knowledgeable about the performance piece or genre they are attending. Without a person with this sort of skill you do a severe ill service to the many outstanding arts organizations performing in Kansas City. I also believe that you do an huge dis-service to the diverse audience of readers looking for arts coverage of this level, and not just a free lance writer unfamiliar with the art form they are attempting to write about. With arts organizations contributing $279 million dollars annually to the economy of this region, I think they deserve more consideration in how they are represented by media professionals.

    Robert McNichols, Jr.

Leave a Comment